Learn › Equipment

Choosing CETMA Composites Fins: PRANA, EDGE, MANTRA and DYNAMI-TECH Compared

Sort by use case first, stiffness second — not the other way round. Where each of the six models sits, the official weight ranges, and the overall comparison chart. Plus why I will not endorse the DRS system on the MANTRA.


Source statement

>

All the specifications below come from CETMA Composites official releases. I am merely

a translator, hoping Asian customers can get a better idea of which fins to choose.

I do not hold possession of any of the info.

The most common mistake when buying fins is opening with "which pair is better". There is no such thing.

Sort by use case first, then by stiffness. Do it the other way round and you will end up with fins that look great and destroy your legs thirty minutes in.

The two axes CETMA sorts its fins by: speciality and stiffness
The two axes: SPECIALITÀ (use case) and RIGIDEZZA (stiffness). Image: CETMA Composites official material.

Step one: the use case

The use cases break down into two groups and four situations:

  1. Freediving — outdoor (open water) and indoor (confined water)
  2. Spearfishing — medium-to-shallow depth, and deep
CETMA use-case matrix
The use-case matrix: freediving indoor and outdoor, spearfishing shallow and deep. Image: CETMA Composites official material.

Some models cross more than one situation, so treat this as a positioning map rather than a set of exclusive categories.

Step two: stiffness, matched to your body

What matters most is choosing by your use case and your body mass. Your fins should not leave your legs overworked.

Body mass here is not only your weight — it includes your height, the length of your lower legs, and how much muscle you carry. Every official weight range is a starting point:

All the weight figures below are official suggestions only. What settles it is how the fins feel when you try them. This applies to every model below and will not be repeated.

The six models

PRANA — built for spearfishing at medium-to-shallow depth

CETMA PRANA carbon fins
PRANA. Image: CETMA Composites official material.

The blade length suits moving through reef and near-shore swell, and the angle makes surface swimming easier.

PRANA stiffness and weight guide
PRANA stiffness and recommended user weight. Image: CETMA Composites official material.

EDGE — strong feedback and drive, for deep spearfishing

Suits divers with strong legs who load the blade hard.

Extra-soft and soft can also be used for freediving, for users in the 75–90kg range. (The spoken official description and the chart differ slightly; go by the chart.)

EDGE stiffness and weight guide
EDGE stiffness and recommended user weight. Image: CETMA Composites official material.

MANTRA — the freediving model, with DRS

CETMA MANTRA with the DRS system
MANTRA and DRS (dynamic resonance system). Image: CETMA Composites official material.

CETMA's DRS (dynamic resonance system) is the selling point of this pair.

The official claim rests on resonance, which is a real phenomenon: when an external driving frequency approaches an object's natural frequency, the object's own oscillation reinforces itself, and the resulting amplitude exceeds the input. At the resonant frequency a very small periodic force can produce a large oscillation, because the system stores the oscillation's energy.

The MANTRA can also be used for spearfishing.

MANTRA stiffness and weight guide
MANTRA stiffness and recommended user weight. Image: CETMA Composites official material.

I will not endorse DRS.

>

As someone with a science background, I am not currently prepared to endorse the DRS system

or the way it is said to work on the MANTRA, **because I have not yet seen any literature or

research on it.** If you have some, please show me.

>

The resonance physics above is sound. But "resonance exists" and "these fins genuinely

exploit resonance and are therefore less tiring" are two different claims. The second one

needs evidence.

MANTRA CWT Competition — built for constant weight

CETMA MANTRA CWT Competition fins
MANTRA CWT Competition. Image: CETMA Composites official material.

Carries the strengths of the MANTRA range, with a layered carbon lay-up intended to reduce leg fatigue.

DYNAMI-TECH — long and short

DYNAMI-TECH short and long versions
DYNAMI-TECH short and long versions. Image: CETMA Composites official material.

Built for pool and outdoor fun. The whole range runs small.

Short

Long

The whole range in one table

ModelWhere it sitsOfficial weight guidance
PRANASpearfishing, medium-to-shallow; reef and near-shore swellSOFT ≤ 75kg / MEDIUM ≤ 90kg
EDGEDeep spearfishing; strong legsextra-soft and soft also freedive, 75–90kg
MANTRAFreediving (with DRS), spearfishing tooSee the official chart
MANTRA CWT CompetitionConstant weightSOFT ≤ 55kg / MEDIUM ≤ 75kg
DYNAMI-TECH ShortPool and outdoor; packs into a cabin bagConsider under 50kg
DYNAMI-TECH LongPool and open water≤ 75kg

Performance scores by scenario

This is probably the most important chart in the whole article.

CETMA model comparison chart
The overall comparison chart. Data from CETMA's official YouTube channel; translated and compiled by leve-leve freediving.

The data comes from CETMA's official YouTube channel. Since everyone differs in height, weight, muscle and even leg proportion, what settles it is still trying them on.

Recap

Translated and compiled by leve-leve freediving.